Stable context such as what a product does is kept separate from changing affiliate terms. Payout, attribution, eligibility, network and promotion details are checked against first-party documentation where available, and uncertain details are labeled or omitted rather than inferred.
Source hierarchy
Program-specific claims are tied to the brand’s own affiliate, partner, legal, support or official program documentation whenever a usable first-party source is available. A third-party list is not treated as evidence for a current payout or attribution window.
What is recorded
Profiles separate program status, commission structure, attribution, approval, payout details, traffic restrictions, geography and recurring duration from broader product context. A field is omitted or qualified when the reviewed source does not publish it clearly.
Conflicts stay visible
If current first-party pages disagree, the profile is marked as a source conflict. The site does not silently choose the more attractive number or merge legacy and current terms into one claim.
Dated reviews
Where a source check has been completed, the program profile shows the review date. Program changes and migrations can also be recorded as dated history so an older offer is not presented as if it were current.
How comparisons and next steps work
Comparison pages reuse the same program records shown on individual profiles and surface material differences before the full table. “Research next” links use explicit relationships such as category, audience, workflow, commercial model and existing direct comparisons. The public site does not expose or rely on an opaque winner score. Site search also interprets explicit constraints such as recurring commission, attribution length, audience and category, then combines them with lexical relevance rather than pretending a hidden score is an editorial verdict.
What this research cannot guarantee
Public partner terms can vary by geography, account, campaign, plan, validation outcome or private agreement. A source-backed profile is a research starting point, not a promise of acceptance, earnings or unchanged future terms.
How source status is shown
Source verifiedThe key program claim is supported by current first-party documentation reviewed for the profile.
Terms need recheckAvailability or a changing commercial term needs a fresh confirmation before it should be treated as current.
Source conflictCurrent first-party pages disagree, so the discrepancy remains visible.
Status profileA closed, paused, rebranded or replaced program is documented for current-status intent rather than recycled as an active offer.